CityCaucus Redux: Survey reveals Vancouver staff morale in terrible shape

Post by Mike Klassen in


An internal memo shared with reveals deep unhappiness among staff

Last year exclusively received a copy of a memo revealing staff morale at City Hall under Vision Vancouver was abysmal. What follows is our post from last August outlining some of the staff concerns. received a copy of a memo and survey that indicates a growing dissatisfaction among over 700 non-union staff working for the City of Vancouver. The memo dated June 15, 2010 is to the City's corporate management team and is signed by President Bill Boons and Vice-President Christine Warren on behalf of the members of the Vancouver Association of Civic Managerial and Professional Staff (VACMPS).

The memo begins with a respectful tone describing a Citywide culture of respect, fairness and a workplace that "drew a clear and important line between administration and politics."

However, the second paragraph goes on to say, "It is truly unfortunate that the environment noted above has changed." It says that "staff in all parts of the organization felt negatively affected by the new style of management." As a results VACMPS was asked "to stand up and present a strong and unified voice to senior management regarding both their concerns and their desire to work toward improvements."

So low key is VACMPS that they barely appear in a Google search. A pair of memos going back to 2000, then the rest is coverage from last year. But recent grievances among exempt (non-union) staff forced VACMPS to reactivate its relationship with Vancouver's top brass: "Based on the wishes of our members and on our constitution, we believe that a more formal relationship with the employer is now necessary."

The documents presented to are in two parts. A three-page letter, with a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation featuring survey results taken from over 70% of exempt staff, or 502 employees. The letter at times has a tone of despair:

"It is also important that senior management is fully aware that the 700+ exempt staff are at risk of becoming disengaged."

The memo states that "after 21 meetings with 225 exempt staff, VACMPS can identify some strong and consistent themes".

These are:

  • A loss of respect and trust throughout the organization;
  • Managers have lost their ability to manage – decision-making has been centralized and many staff have resported being unable to provide good service;
  • Inefficient and expensive processes have replaced methods which were cheaper and more efficient (emphasis ours);
  • Staff retention is becoming an issue; we are beginning to lose corporate knowledge on a significant scale;
  • The City seems to be moving away from its core values...many younger staff report that they are reconsidering their decision to build a career at the City (emphasis ours);
  • Staff are fearful of reprisals which is leading to a "heads down/don't rock the boat" attitude. Creativity and excellence are not being stimulated.

The fifteen pages of survey results follow. At the top of the list of items cited by survey respondents is "Lack of trust, respect and acknowledgement of skills/abilities/decision-making", with 52.7% agreed. The next slides outline the additional major concerns by management.

Back in December during a gruelling budget process there was significant pressure put upon management staff to carry the load and forego wage increases due to them.

The rest of the survey sums up with this list of concerns:

  • "If senior managers continue to leave the result will be a lack of continuity in decisions and information"
  • Low morale
  • Need for budget transparency
  • There is less independent thought and creativity
  • Feeling of security among staff

The vast majority of respondents describe themselves as having "limited or moderate empowerment". The give barely passing marks to the City for their effort to uphold stated corporate values. The slide discussing "concerns about losing staff" has its top response (a whopping 35%) saying "I am undecided about my future".

The rest of the document lists several proposed solutions put to senior management for how to improve the present situation.

It's not clear what progress if any has been made since these presentations were made to the City Manager and corporate management team, but the fact we received this information only last week suggests that the situation is still dynamic.

Certainly the decline in morale at Vancouver City Hall has been palpable and sad to watch for many. The loss of so many senior managers to early retirements and firings is having predictable consequences.

Vancouver voters by-in-large are most interested in the quality of the services they receive from the City. If, as we've been hearing, that some staff are now "working to rule" as a result of present conditions, it may be only a matter of time before the troubles among 700+ non-union employees raises the hackles of the greater public.

As with this document, we invite other public servants to share their brown envelopes with

- Post by Mike Klassen. Mike is a city council candidate for the Vancouver Non-Partisan Association (NPA). If you're an elected official or candidate seeking a nomination and want to write about urban issues, please send your 450-500 word submission to


Staff morale? It should be good though. let's ask Kurt Heinrich, Sadhu Johnston and Penny Ballem or that GM for the Van Park Board and recreation how do they feel racking in a cool million dollars of public monies and benefits and secret severance packages for when they'll get the boot... I think they are rather satisfied. A crook always is.

Asking for brown envelopes on a web site? This must be the new fashioned electioneering. Boons and Warren are retired. Both overpaid and old NPA hires. Of course they were going to squawk on the way out. When the old administration under Judy Rogers faced any rebellion, it was quickly extinguished and any of the players were brutally treated.
There were no websites for treason in those days.

@City Holler:

Asking for 'brown evelopes' via websites is nothing new. Other bloggers have done the same. Where do you think most journalists get their info from.

Unhappy people will look for payback in any form they can get it.

Public outing, public humiliation, is a good start.

Check out!

Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement